Did it ever strike you as odd that the Roman numeral for four appears as ‘IIII’ on watches and clocks, rather than the commonly used ‘IV’ ? This peculiar anomaly has intrigued historians, horologists, and watch enthusiasts alike. The use of IIII instead of IV on timekeeping devices is a tradition rooted in history, mythology, aesthetics, and practical considerations. Let’s dive into this fascinating topic.
The Enigma of IIII: delving into Horological History
From Etruscan Numerals to Roman Times
The use of IIII over IV owes its origin partly to historical context tracing back to the era of Ancient Rome. Interestingly, it was the Etruscans, predecessors of the Romans who first utilised this system. They used repetitive numerals such as I, iI, iII, and so on up until IIII to represent numbers. Even after the establishment of Roman numeration system, the usage of IIII continued in certain areas for various reasons.
The Influence of Mythology
In terms of mythology-related considerations, Jupiter, the king of gods in Roman pantheon had his name inscribed as IVPITER. This caused discomfort among many Romans when it came to using ‘IV’ as a representation for number four. Using Jupiter’s initials could be seen as inappropriate or even sacrilegious.
Deciphering IV: myths and Realities
The Tale of Louis XIV
Moving forward from ancient times to more recent history – an intriguing theory comes from none other than King Louis XIV of France himself. Legend tells us that he preferred the clock numerals in his palace to read IIII instead of IV. His preference was then adopted by many clockmakers, creating a lasting impact on the world of horology.
Was there a Price to Pay ?
There’s even a popular folklore that King Louis ordered the execution of a clockmaker who dared to use IV instead of IIII. Whether this is pure myth or reality remains ambiguous, but it certainly adds an element of drama to our exploration into the mysteries behind the number four on timepieces.
Jupiter vs Louis XIV: the Power of Names
The Influence of Royalty and Gods
The influence of powerful figures such as gods and kings over how we perceive numbers is undeniable. Both Jupiter’s initials and Louis XIV’s preference had significant bearing on encouraging the use of IIII over IV. This not only shows the deference afforded to them at that time but also now serves as an intriguing historical time stamp on our modern timepieces.
Symmetry and Balance: the Aesthetic Reasons Behind IIII
A Matter of Visual Preference
Beyond mythology and history, aesthetics also played a crucial role in justifying the use of IIII. Using IIII instead of IV provides perfect balance when placed opposite VIII on the dial. This creates visually pleasing symmetry which is often sought after in design.
Readability on Clock Faces: why IIII Wins
Making Time Telling Easier
In terms practicality, using IIII helps divide the clock face into equivalent thirds, making it simpler and quicker to read time. Furthermore, there’s lesser chance for confusion between IV (four) and VI (six) – two numerals that bear resemblance when quickly glanced at.
Beyond Time: symbolic Meanings of the Roman Numeral IIII
Quadrants and Cardinal Points
There are also those who argue that using IIII on clocks instead of IV is symbolic. The four Is could stand for the four quadrants in a day or the cardinal points, reinforcing the cyclical and directional nature of time.
From Jove’s enduring legacy to Louis XIV’s peculiar preference, from aesthetic balance to enhancing readability on clock faces, there’s more than meets the eye when it comes to understanding why we see ‘IIII’ and not ‘IV’ on our timepieces. Ultimately, this quirky tradition speaks volumes about our intricate relationship with time – how we choose to measure it, represent it, and most importantly, respect its historical traditions.
As a young independent media, Tangerine aneeds your help. Please support us by following us and bookmarking us on Google News. Thank you for your support!